| 1. Confirm the exact anchor type and intended use | Product drawing, specification, material description, rated capacity, installation instructions, and declared application. | Check that the documents identify the same anchor type and intended loading conditions as your design. Confirm whether loading is axial, angled, or multidirectional and whether the product is intended for a permanent or temporary installation. | A general capacity claim with no product identification, loading direction, or installation conditions. | Standards are product- and application-specific. Do not assume a standard for forged eyebolts also covers cast-in, bonded, or other anchor systems. |
| 2. Establish batch and material traceability | Batch or heat number records; material certificates, where applicable; production and inspection records; and a sample marking or label. | Trace a sample product marking or batch code back through the inspection records to the relevant material or production batch. Confirm that the records identify the ordered product and material grade. | Missing or duplicated batch identifiers, certificates that do not match the product, or records that cannot be linked to the delivered lot. | EN 10204 describes types of inspection documents for metallic products. A document type alone does not establish that a lifting product complies with its product standard. |
| 3. Validate certificates and supplier records | Quality-system certificates, product declarations, inspection documents, and the names and contact details of issuing bodies where relevant. | Check certificate scope, validity dates, covered site, product category, and issuing body. Verify certificates directly with the issuer or its official verification service when available. | Expired or out-of-scope certificates, altered documents, unverifiable certificate numbers, or a quality-system certificate presented as proof that every product is certified. | A quality-management-system certificate is not, by itself, product approval or evidence that a particular batch passed inspection. |
| 4. Review test evidence, not just test claims | Test reports identifying the specimen or lot, test method, equipment, calibration status, results, acceptance criteria, and test date. | Confirm that the reported test applies to the product type and production lot in question. Check that the results are compared with stated acceptance criteria and that the test method matches the applicable specification. | A report with no product or lot identification, unexplained results, missing acceptance criteria, or a generic statement such as “tested” without supporting records. | Test requirements vary by product standard and contract. A sample or type test does not automatically prove that every delivered unit was individually proof-tested. |
| 5. Match the standard to the product and destination market | A written list of claimed standards, product conformity documents, and the technical specification used for the order. | Check the standard’s title, edition, scope, and relevance to the exact anchor. Confirm applicable legal and project requirements with the buyer, designer, or local authority. | A standard number with no edition or scope, or a claim that one standard applies universally to all lifting anchors. | Examples include ISO 3266 for forged steel eyebolts for general lifting purposes; EN 1677-1 for certain forged steel components for slings; and ASME B30.26 for rigging hardware within its scope. These are not interchangeable or universally applicable. |
| 6. Check identification, capacity, and installation information | Marking requirements, product label or sample, working load limit (WLL) information, installation instructions, and inspection guidance. | Confirm that identification and capacity information are legible and consistent with the technical documents. Review permitted loading directions, installation torque or embedment requirements where specified, and any restrictions on use. | Unmarked products, inconsistent capacity figures, unclear loading restrictions, or instructions that omit critical installation conditions. | WLL and installation requirements depend on product design, configuration, and applicable specification. Do not infer capacity from appearance or dimensions alone. |
| 7. Agree on delivery-lot inspection and record retention | Purchase specification, inspection and acceptance plan, packing-list traceability, nonconformance process, and agreed document-retention period. | Define which records must accompany each shipment and how nonconforming or damaged items will be identified and handled. Retain documents so delivered products can be traced to their batch and inspection evidence. | Unclear acceptance criteria, no process for handling nonconforming goods, or shipment documents that cannot identify the supplied lot. | Set documentation and retention requirements in the purchase contract, taking account of applicable regulations, project rules, and the product’s service life. |